10 July 2011

Why Facebook sucks

Now that people are starting to migrate from Facebook to Google Plus, I see a lot of people asking, apparently seriously, what’s wrong with Facebook. Given that Facebook is hated as much as airlines, it seems likely that the site has few dedicated fans willing to stick around when everyone else leaves. I’m certainly not one of them, and here’s why. Facebook insists that you get a new e-mail inbox, which you can only access from Facebook. ... Read more

9 July 2011

Google Plus: Profile restrictions

Google requires that you put your legal name in your profile. No incomplete names or pseudonyms. They also require that you have a name consisting of a first name and surname. They will suspend profiles of anyone who does not obey the above restrictions, locking you out of the system. This will also break other Google services such as Latitude. All it takes is one person to report the profile. ... Read more

30 June 2011


I really want someone to provide a viable alternative to Facebook. This week Google launched Google Plus. Before long I got an e-mail from someone inviting me to a “Hangout”. Clicking the link took me to a page that told me I wasn’t allowed in. Clicking the link to unsubscribe from such e-mails took me to a 404 page. That’s not social networking, that’s spam. I flagged it as such. ... Read more

19 May 2011

Idea for the 21st Century: Online persona franchising

There are a number of people working in Open Source who have spent a lot of time developing a very distinctive and famous (or infamous) online persona. I’m thinking here of people like Theo de Raadt, Zed Shaw, Giles Bowkett, and so on. So why don’t they cash in on this brand equity with a franchising scheme? Imagine it. Every major programming language could have its own licensed Zed Shaw. Every developer forum could have a local Giles Bowkett franchisee, giving the real Giles more time for coding. ... Read more

18 May 2011

T-Mobile letter reply received

Got a reply from Senator John Cornyn of Texas. He cited federal anti-trust laws, and that he supported their enforcement. So I’m thinking that means he thinks the merger should go ahead, on the grounds that the federal government will watch over AT&T’s behavior afterwards so it’s OK.

© mathew 2017