May 06

My initial thoughts about the Kindle DX:

The price seems surprisingly reasonable. The iRex with an A4 size screen was over $800.

I’m not convinced that textbooks are workable on an e-book reader. You don’t read textbooks linearly. (Or at least, I never did.) The ability to flip around between marked locations is limited on the Kindle 2, and I’m guessing it will be on the DX as well.

On the other hand, the size and weight benefits are hard to deny. However, I never used to carry multiple textbooks around with me. Maybe American students’ habits are different?

It wouldn’t work for me as a general purpose device for reading novels as well as PDFs, because it won’t fit into a shoulder bag or reasonable size backpack. With a screen that big, it’ll be scarily easy to break by banging your bag against the corner of a table, unless you get some kind of metal hardcase.

Newspapers? Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t see the ability to display text in multiple columns as that big of a win. Consider that most people under the age of about 50 get their written news from the web, where a single column for the stories is the rule. We went through all the madness of trying to make electronic pages look like newspaper pages ten years ago; it didn’t work as well as a simple clickable table of contents. I bet the newspaper guys think going back to multiple columns is a great idea, though. As for diagrams, the existing Kindle can display those fairly adequately, it’s mainly being held back by the content producers failing to include them.

What about magazines, which generally require color? If I’m going to be spending a big chunk of cash on something with an A4 screen, I want to be able to read Scientific American on it without compromises.

Overall, I’m more skeptical about this than I was about the original Kindle. I think I’d advise waiting to see what Pixel Qi come up with, not to mention the CrunchPad.

May 06

As the promised followup to my review of the Kindle 2, I’m going to go through some of the common objections to the Kindle that I see reposted every time it gets mentioned. I have no financial stake in Amazon’s success; it just annoys me to see the same misconceptions crop up time and time again. Continue reading »

May 03

I bought an Amazon Kindle 2 earlier this year. I’ve now read several novels and a bunch of short stories on it, as well as two magazines and a newspaper. I feel I know the device well enough to be able to review it.

Mobile phones are all about bling. Fancy cases, custom screensavers, custom ringtones, and so on. The iPhone has upped the ante as far as bright candy-colored animated buttons, slick animations, and throwaway gimmick applications. Reading a book, however, is all about forgetting the object, forgetting the real world, and being drawn into the text. So ultimately, the ideal e-book reader would be one you barely noticed.

The Kindle is a pretty good design. It basically works as a book, which means you shouldn’t expect any "wow" moments. In fact, it’s easy to examine it and think "So what?" Many people have done just that. But I’m going to leave the naysaying for another article. First, I want to talk about what it’s like to live with and use a Kindle.

The device itself is about the size of a trade paperback. Here are a couple of pictures of it sitting with a paperback copy of Philip K. Dick’s masterpiece "VALIS":

Kindle vs VALIS

Kindle thickness compared to book

As you can see, it’s about the same size and thickness, and that’s including the protective case. To compare the Kindle to another familiar object, it’s about the same size as a regular DVD case, plus an extra centimeter or two of height.

On the other hand, the Kindle is a bit less than twice the weight of the trade paperback. The metal back probably doesn’t help, but it does mean that the device feels solid and substantial, and not like a piece of cheap flimsy plastic.

Putting it all together, with the extra weight and familiar size, it still feels like a book. Sitting and reading with it therefore feels immediately somewhat familiar and comfortable.

Of course, that’s a comparison with a single trade paperback of typical size. Here’s a different comparison:

Kindle vs doorstops

That’s the complete Hitchhiker’s Guide in hardback, and a copy of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest in paperback. I’ve also got Infinite Jest on the Kindle; guess which is more comfortable to curl up in bed with?

The main attraction of the Kindle is the screen. It uses e-ink, which means that the screen basically looks like laser printer output. To be more precise, the Kindle screen has about half the resolution of a low end laser printer, but uses shades of gray to antialias the text and make it smoother. There is no glow or flicker at all. The background is gray, and the print is dark gray; overall, it has slightly less contrast than a well printed paper book, but still looks very good.

Here’s a photo of a yellowing Harlan Ellison paperback, next to the Kindle screen. I’m not sure exactly why, but the Kindle doesn’t seem to look good in photos. In real life, the two are about comparable in readability. The paper has slightly better contrast, but the cheap printing tends to mean the letterforms are a bit irregular.
Kindle screen readability
You’ll notice I’ve put a dark vinyl skin on my Kindle. The pure white of the casing is one of the few design errors Amazon have made. Because of the way our eyes work, it makes the e-ink screen look darker and less readable than it really is. That’s why if you see a Sony e-book in your local Borders, you might think its screen looks superior. (The bright lighting in the store also helps.)

Some have questioned why the bezel around the Kindle screen is so large. It turns out that there’s a good design reason: it makes the device more comfortable to hold. The space at the sides of the screen is almost exactly the width of my thumb. I can hold the device in one hand, gripping with my thumb, without touching the screen. To flip to the next page, I simply need to roll my thumb slightly, thus clicking the next page button. This means that it’s actually easier to flip to the next page on the Kindle than it is with a paper book. In addition, there’s no risk of accidentally flipping two pages at once.

A related issue that worries people about the Kindle is that the screen refresh is slow compared to an LCD. Also, the entire screen blinks while it refreshes. Well, I’m glad to say that after a very few hours, it becomes a non-issue; you simply don’t notice it any more.

The first reason is that the "blink" isn’t like an LCD flashing; there’s no light emitted. Secondly, the refresh happens significantly faster than I can reliably turn a page in a paper book. And thirdly, you subconsciously learn to time your button click so that the refresh happens while your eyes are moving from the bottom of the screen back to the top. Honestly, I’ve been jolted out of the flow of reading more often with problems turning pages in paper books.

Of course, it’s not good enough to be able to do the things that a paper book does. Technology needs to offer some advantages, so let me outline a few.

First of all, you can change the text size. The picture above shows the second smallest size, which is about the same as a paperback. If you have poor eyesight, you can flip to double size without needing to buy a special large print version of your books. That’s probably one of the reasons why Kindle ownership seems to skew towards older readers.

I don’t need large text, but a feature I do find myself using is the built-in dictionary. If I hit a word I don’t know, I can highlight it with the cursor to get a brief description, without leaving the page. (The definition appears in a bubble at the bottom of the screen.) Clicking enter gives me the full Concise Oxford American Dictionary entry, if I want it. When I’m done, I can hit Back to go back to where I was.

Now, obviously I have a paper dictionary sitting on my bookshelves. I could go look up words from paper books–but I hardly ever did. I never wanted to break my reading session, go find the dictionary, and leaf through it to find the right definition. As for the idea of carrying the dictionary around with me when reading–no, that wasn’t going to happen. So Kindle will probably lead to my actually learning some new words.

Another feature I use a lot is highlighting. You can use the cursor joystick to swipe across some text. That text automatically appears in a text file you can read on your computer, complete with the title of the book you read it in, the author name, and the place in the book. If you view your highlighted text from the Kindle, you can jump back to the actual page.

Annotations work much the same way: Move the cursor to the spot and start typing, and you get a footnote marker in the text which will lead you to your note. The note itself appears in a computer-readable text file, again with the author and title and location.

These features absolutely rock my world for book club reading and personal study. I’m currently working through a book on US history, annotating and highlighting as I go. When I’m done I’ll pull the text into an outliner, and use it as an instant first draft of some revision notes. Similarly, when reading last month’s book for the book club I’m in, I swiped bits I particularly liked, and jotted down notes here and there, then e-mailed the file to my BlackBerry to act as discussion crib notes. So again, there’s a real convenience gain over jotting in a notebook or on an envelope used as a bookmark.

Ah yes, bookmarks. Say goodbye to those. When you want to stop reading with Kindle, you can just put it down and forget about it. It’ll power off automatically after a few minutes of no page turns, flipping the screen to a picture of a famous author or illuminated manuscript. When you pick it up and push the switch to turn it on, you’re right back where you left off.

You can even close the book you’re reading and go back to the menu and read something else, and next time you open the same book, you go back to wherever you were last reading.

What if you page back to an earlier point in the book to revisit something earlier? Push the menu button, and there’s an option to jump you straight to the furthest point you’ve read to.

If you still really, really want a way to drop multiple bookmarks, then the annotation feature will do the job. However, Kindle is primarily aimed at the kind of text you read from start to finish in a linear fashion. If that’s what you’re reading, you never have to think about bookmarks, never have to deal with lost bookmarks. The right thing happens automatically.

Having said that Kindle is aimed at linear reading, it does nevertheless have a search feature. I haven’t used it, other than to verify that it works. I imagine I might find a use for it when I’m done with my history book and want to go back and see if I missed noting any good stuff about Thomas Jefferson.

Books can also have a table of contents, allowing you to click an entry with the joystick and skip to the appropriate part of the book. There can be cover art too, though the grayscale screen isn’t going to wow you with that.

You might be wondering about battery life. The e-ink screen uses no power to maintain its display, so the only time battery is used is when you push a button. I go over a week between charges, even with heavy weekend reading.

One thing that does eat battery is the wireless networking. For that reason, I don’t tend to use the Kindle for web browsing, and turn off the wireless unless I’m expecting to receive something. Even with wireless on, though, a battery charge will last you for days. The charger is barely larger than an AC wall plug. It’s USB, so you can also charge from a computer, or a universal USB charger. The cable for the Kindle is a standard micro-USB cable. Ah, if only Apple were as good about using non-proprietary chargers and cables…

Buying books is easy. You go to Amazon, log in, find something interesting, and hit the 1-click button to buy it. In less than a minute, it appears on your Kindle. You can also order stuff from the Kindle itself, but I’ve generally found that the experience is better with the full Amazon web site rather than the cut-down pages served up on the device itself.

Another killer feature is the free previews. When I see any moderately interesting book that has a Kindle edition, I hit the free preview button. Amazon sends me a chunk of the first chapter. If I read that and decide I want to read the rest of the book, I can order the book straight from the Kindle. The full book replaces the preview, and inside a minute I’m back to reading.

According to rumors, Amazon is getting 10% of its book sales as Kindle editions. Amazon say that Kindle owners buy 2.6x as many books at Amazon as non-Kindle-owners. I don’t doubt this, as I’ve found that the Kindle has gotten me reading more. The conveniences I’ve described may seem slight, but when you add them together, it seems to me that the Kindle is better than paper. I find myself increasingly reluctant to buy paper books–especially when they’re hardbacks, lengthy works, or (worst of all) both.

The Kindle does have some downsides. Yes, the initial cost is pretty high, as it’s still very much at the early adopter phase right now. You have to read a lot of books to make up the money in savings, so don’t look at it from a cost-saving point of view; it’s all about convenience.

There’s not much snob value either. If you’re the kind of New York hipster who has to be seen reading the right books, the Kindle won’t appeal to you.

A related issue is that the selection of e-books available isn’t fantastic. It annoys me that there’s nothing by Lem, very little by J.G. Ballard, not enough Harlan Ellison, no Jeff Noon, only one book by Michael Marshall Smith, and so on. It’s rather like the early days of CD or DVD; and as was the case with those new technologies, the selection is getting better all the time.

But that said, there are already more wonderful books than I’ll ever have time to read–so perhaps it’s time I get back to my comfy chair. In a while, I’ll be writing a second article, dealing with common objections to the Kindle, and whether they stand up.

Mar 13

Amazon have misused the DMCA to demand takedown of a file called azw-0.1.zip. Since I have both the archive file and a Kindle, and have used both together, I can explain what’s really going on. Hopefully this will clear up some of the misinformation floating around.

The code in the disputed zip file is written in Python. It calculates the Mobipocket PID for your Kindle, based on the serial number written on the back. You can then provide this PID to any e-book store that sells e-books in DRMed Mobipocket format. They can sell you encrypted Mobipocket e-books, and you can then run a second Python script which flips a flag in the e-book file, making it readable on your Kindle. (The flag is just one that says “This is encrypted for Kindle”; no encryption is broken.)

This works because Amazon bought Mobipocket a few years ago, and used their DRM scheme and e-book format as the basis of the Kindle’s e-book format. The basic Mobipocket format is pretty simple. It’s HTML inside a Palm OS PDB database. That’s it. The DRM just adds a layer of encryption.

So, why are Amazon upset about this?

One theory is that they don’t want Kindle owners buying books anywhere other than Amazon.com. Well, if that’s the case, they’re playing a losing game, because Fictionwise (recently purchased by Barnes & Noble) sells e-books in DRM-free Mobipocket format, which you can just drag-drop onto your Kindle.

A second theory is that Amazon don’t want people to be able to create DRM-encumbered e-books for Kindle themselves, bypassing whatever fees Amazon may be charging for the service. I don’t know how true that may be, as I have no interest in creating DRM-encumbered anything, so I’ve never investigated how much Amazon charges.

My personal theory is that the real reason Amazon don’t want people finding out their Kindle’s Mobipocket PID is a fear that people will then find out how to decrypt their DRM-encumbered Mobipocket books.

And indeed, there is a completely different set of Python scripts floating around on the web that will decrypt a Mobipocket e-book given the PID used to encrypt it. This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone; DRM is fundamentally flawed. Clearly the e-book reader software has to have all the information necessary to decrypt the book so that it can show it to me. That being the case, it’s inevitable that the decryption code will be reverse-engineered if enough people are motivated enough to do so.

But make no mistake: the azw-0.1 files do not break any copy protection or reveal any secret codes. They just calculate the PID of your Kindle, based on the serial number that’s written right on the back of the device in plain sight. They are interoperability tools, and the DMCA explicitly allows for interoperability tools. I suspect that the EFF could take on this case and win easily.

While I’m writing, here’s a quick summary of a few Kindle myths that I see repeated a lot in coverage of the story:

  • The Kindle traps you into buying everything from Amazon.

    Not true. Even if the azw scripts were illegal, you could still buy as much DRM-free content as you liked, load it directly onto the Kindle via USB, and never use the wireless connection to Amazon at all. As mentioned above, you can buy DRM-free e-books in Kindle-ready Mobipocket files from Fictionwise.

    It’s like the iPod: you may be stuck with a single vendor for DRM-encumbered content, but you can buy your DRM-free content from anywhere. Personally, I intend to buy as little DRM-crippled content as possible, and hope that Amazon gets the message.

  • The Kindle uses proprietary e-book format.

    As mentioned above, the Kindle’s native format is a trivial variation on Mobipocket format, which is HTML inside a Palm PDB database. The open-source mobiperl tools will pack and unpack .mobi and .azw files.

    As Mobipocket’s FAQ points out, the HTML extensions and metadata are based on an open industry standard.

    Also, there are free tools from Mobipocket for creating e-books. They’re Windows-only, however, and don’t seem to work under WINE.

  • You have to get all your content onto your Kindle by sending it to Amazon.

    Wrong. The Kindle mounts as a hard drive, using Storage Class USB. No drivers are required on Windows, Mac or Linux. Your library of books appears in a folder called “documents”. They’re just .azw and .mobi files. You can drag more books into the folder in Mobipocket or ISO-8859-1 text format, and the Kindle will display them.

    If you want to read PDFs, you have three options. One is to e-mail the PDF to your Amazon Kindle e-mail address; Amazon will convert it and it will appear wirelessly on your Kindle, at a cost of 10 cents. The second option is to e-mail the PDF to your free Kindle conversion e-mail address, and have Amazon e-mail it back in mobi/azw format for you to load onto your Kindle via USB. The third option is to use free tools to convert the PDF to mobi yourself, in which case Amazon need never see what’s in your PDF.

    From my own experiments, it appears that Amazon are using the open source pdf2edit on their back end as the conversion tool. Either that, or they’re using something which has exactly the same formatting conversion quirks.

Jun 04

Decision

, , Comments Off

I will allow myself to buy an Amazon Kindle. But first, I must read all the books on my "books to read" shelf.

Except "Infinite Jest", the size of which makes it a prime candidate for e-book reading.

Apr 09

Please create the following Java MIDP application for my phone:

When you run the application and take a picture of a barcode using the phone’s camera, it decodes the barcode, and adds the item to my Amazon wish list or some other Amazon list of my choice.

If Amazon doesn’t carry the item, it should add an “unrecognized item with UPC code xxxxx” item instead.

Thanks.

P.S. Please don’t try to patent it.

Dec 10

I just picked up some more Christmas music from the Amazon MP3 store. For all that I like the iTunes Music Store, the Amazon MP3 store is better in every way.

First off, the selection is far, far better. I say that because I don’t buy DRM I can’t easily remove, so the iTMS’s rather anemic selection of “iTunes Plus” albums compares badly to Amazon’s library.

Secondly, there’s the format issue. For all that 256kbps AAC is theoretically better than 256kbps MP3, in practice I tend to encode with LAME’s standard preset, which averages less than 256kbps and is practically indistinguishable from CD in my personal testing. I think it’s easy to be too picky about digital audio. If I could approach my vinyl-buying self of 1983 and offer him his record library in 160kbps MP3s on an iPod, he’d leap at the chance. So given that the quality is good enough, I’d rather have MP3s I can play anywhere than AAC files I can only play most places.

Amazon have the convenience angle sorted too. In fact, it’s a little bit too convenient–it’s one click to buy an album once you install their downloader. The downloader automatically files everything neatly in folders by artist and album, and adds the tracks to iTunes when it’s done.

But enough about the technical jiggery-pokery. The actual music is what counts. First of all I picked up the Vince Guaraldi Trio’s album of music from A Charlie Brown Christmas. I’m not a jazz fan, and I’m not a big fan of the TV adaptation of Peanuts either, but somehow the soundtrack is perfect.

Next I picked up a couple of Cocteau Twins Christmas singles from a compilation. This is where digital downloads really shine–I can buy two songs for 89¢ each rather than a 4-CD compilation I don’t want.

I then went looking for quirky Christmas music, and found Tis The Season For Los Straitjackets.  I already have a Tijuana Brass Christmas album and a two different Moog Christmas albums. I’m kinda disappointed that Señor Coconut hasn’t tried his hand at a Kraftwerk Christmas album yet.  Ah well, at least there’s the 8bits of Christmas.

Also in my collection are Mark Mothersbaugh’s Joyeux Mutato, and the Illegal Art A MUTATED CHRISTMAS release. Plus, of course, a hefty dose of bootleg/mashup Christmas tracks downloaded from the web.

If anyone has any other recommendations for quirky but listenable Christmas albums, please post ‘em.

Nov 20

Dear Amazon,

You’re so almost there with your new Kindle e-book. There are just a few minor details you need to fix to get me on board.

First of all, you need Mac support, and preferably Linux support as well, both for content creation and for reading books. There’s really no excuse for not having reader support, as you have a working Mobipocket reader in Java that will run on Mac and Linux, you just haven’t taken the time to package it up properly. The creation tools ought to be a pretty simple task to port too; a command line version would be fine. I don’t even care if it can’t apply DRM; I just want a way to be able to package up free text.

Secondly, you need to either drop the DRM, or drop the price of the books. Let’s consider a real example here. I’m about to start reading Charlie Stross’s The Atrocity Archives.

Let’s get one thing straight here: because there’s DRM, I can’t sell the book when I’m done with it, which breaks the first sale doctrine. Therefore, you’re not actually selling e-books, you’re renting them to me for an indefinite period of time, a bit like Netflix does with DVDs. I’d respect you more if you admitted that.

Anyhow, If I go the Kindle route, it’s $9.99 for the book.

Suppose I go the paper route instead. I can pick up a new copy on amazon.com marketplace for $12 plus $4 shipping = $16. When I’m done reading it, I can sell it for $9 second hand. Total cost to me = $7.

So the Kindle is more expensive, and I can’t actually buy the books. That to me is a poor deal.

Oh, sure, Kindle prices include network bandwidth… but with paper books, I had to include the cost of physically shipping dead tree across the country, and I still came out ahead. If you can’t beat the paper book price-per-reading, you’re doing something seriously wrong.

We’ve all watched the music industry flail around overcharging for DRM-burdened files and get nowhere. Learn from their mistakes. Drop the DRM, or drop the book prices to $5 or so (comparable to a DVD or video game rental, plus some markup to cover network costs) and I’ll order my Kindle tomorrow.

Update: Of course, if you gave me the Kindle for free, I’d use it to buy books from you, and look on the extra cost as a convenience fee.

Dec 20

We’ve been out getting the food for Christmas. The supermarket sells corn for squirrels—it even has a picture of a squirrel on the bag. I also picked up a big $3 bag of sunflower seeds, it’ll be their Christmas gift. The man standing behind us in the checkout queue was a squirrel skeptic. “You’re feeding rats!”

We got a fake tree this year, after Mythbusters covered how much damage a tree can do if it catches on fire and rothko decided she didn’t want a real tree in the house after all. Safety aside, there’s something to be said for not having needles everywhere, and having branches strong enough to hold up weightier ornaments. You can get Christmas tree smell as scented candles, and probably as an aerosol too.

The big excitement, though, is that we managed to get some mince pies this year. I don’t think I’d seen any since we visited my family for Christmas several years ago.

No Wii for Christmas. I tried stores, I tried online, no luck. I even tried the Amazon customers vote, which said I had a slightly better chance of winning the chance to buy a Wii than I had of getting hemorrhoids, which kinda makes me feel better that that sort of probability is by no means a sure thing.

Jun 03

It appears I have located another job within IBM. What’s more, it’s one that’s entirely suited to my skill set, in the technical sales part of the organization. My appetite has come back with a vengeance.

On Saturday we went on a day trip to Dallas. Kind of insane if you look at the map, but [rothko] had a business meeting, and I didn’t want her to have to drive for 8 hours given her tendonitis. Plus, I needed some distraction from my work situation.

We met up with [stick_figure] and had some lunch; then [rothko] took the Prius to Arlen—er, Garland—and [stick_figure] and I went to the aquarium.

If you know me, you can probably guess the big appeal of the aquarium: otters. In fact, the Dallas World Aquarium is the only place in the US to have el lobo del rio, the Giant River Otter of the Amazon. You haven’t lived until you’ve seen a 5′ otter.

Dealey Plaza was a strange experience. It’s more or less exactly as it was in 1963. The picket fence is still there, with the car park behind it.