Nov 18

Tom Tomorrow has his panties in a bunch over the outrageous behavior of Internet users. He was shocked this week to discover that some people were reading his published web log using special purpose web log browsing software (aka “news aggregators”), rather than the software he wants them to use (a web browser). Worse still, the miscreants were skipping the ads! Quel horreur!

It rather reminds me of the CEO of Turner Broadcasting, who declared that skipping TV ads using fast forward was “stealing the programming”.

Here’s the deal: if you publish or broadcast something, you don’t get to control how people choose to read or watch it.

If I want to watch Cartoon Network on an HDTV and chop the logo off the bottom of the screen, I can. If I choose to read AOL Time Warner’s web sites using a non-AOL web browser, I can. If I want to block your ads or change the layout of your web site using a local style sheet, tough luck, you can’t stop me.

I think the argument that it’s rude for me to skip TV or web ads is ridiculous. However, you may disagree, in which case here are some rules which may soon appear in the Tom Tomorrow Guide to Etiquette.

  • When viewing television, politely sit and watch every TV ad. Do not go to the bathroom or fetch a snack. If you must use a VCR to time-shift, do not fast forward through the ads. What, you expect the TV companies to let you watch that programming as you wish?

  • Make sure you are careful to read every ad on every page of the newspaper. If you must throw away a section of the paper, be sure to read every advertisement first. Otherwise, you are automatically skipping a big chunk of ads which helped pay for the newspaper you enjoyed, and that would be quite literally stealing content from the newspaper, wouldn’t it?

  • Make sure you open and read every single piece of junk postal mail you receive. The postal service you use is heavily subsidized by the money it makes from bulk advertising mail. To toss junk mail in the trash automatically without opening and examining the ads would be taking advantage of something without paying for it. That would be stealing, wouldn’t it?

  • When you’re listening to the car radio, never change the station during an ad break. The ads pay for the radio transmitter and the electricity used to broadcast the music. If they couldn’t advertise to you, why, the radio station would go away entirely. So if you skip the ads by pushing a button, you’re obviously human scum.

  • You know those advertising inserts in magazines? They’re there because the publisher wants you to have to look at them and move them aside to read the whole article. If you rip them out so you can just read the entire article without seeing the ad, well, you’re stealing. What, you want the content handed to you on a silver platter?

Meanwhile in the real world…

People skip ads all the time. Sometimes manually, sometimes automatically, but mostly without thinking or even registering the presence of the ad. Our daily environment is so ad-infested at this point that even the advertisers are admitting that it is becoming harder and harder to ‘reach’ people (where by ‘reach’ they often mean ‘interrupt’, ’distract’ or ‘annoy’).

If people’s desires and behavior make advertising ineffective, that’s just tough luck for advertising. If technology makes it easy for people to skip ads and people want to skip ads, then people will skip ads. You can rant all you like, but the world was not designed for the express purpose of advertising, and there’s no guarantee it will stay amenable to your marketing messages.

In fact, the Internet was never designed to be friendly to advertising. The fact that you can advertise on the web at all is accident. The Internet existed before web advertising, and will probably still exist in some form when capitalism has collapsed on itself and mass marketing is something kids are asked to read about in history textbooks. If my skipping ads breaks your business model, you need to find a new business model.

And now it’s disclosure time. I’m one of those evil RSS-readin’ web-aggregatin’ freeloading varmints. Except that I have bought a bunch of Tom Tomorrow books, and I wear a baseball cap with Sparky the Wonder Penguin embroidered on the front, purchased from you-know-who’s web site. (As an aside: I wish Ted Rall was still selling embroidered caps in custom sizes, I could totally go for an El Busho cap too, but One Size Does Not Fit All.)

I think I’ve demonstrated that I’m responsible and adult enough to make my own moral choices, so I don’t particularly appreciate being told that I’m “human scum” because I choose not to look at ads every day, and only go browse them when I feel like getting a new T-shirt or some bumper stickers.

Jan 06

According to Asia Business Times, many US corporations are preparing major efforts to shift jobs from the US to countries like India and China. A few of the big names: Microsoft, IBM, AT&T Wireless, Disney, AOL Time Warner, and News International (Fox). You probably haven’t seen many big announcements, though. As the Times explains:

…on the threshold of a US presidential election year, job losses are a hot button issue. A company that highlighted a major job transfer could wind up in the campaign debate.

Yes, they’re holding off on the triumphant “we’re saving millions of dollars and making our rich stockholders even richer by shipping jobs to India” announcements, because they don’t want to risk encouraging people to vote for an administration slightly less cosy with big business than the current one.

The corollary: If Bush is re-elected, look for massive rounds of layoffs immediately afterwards.

Nov 30
2 Corporation for Public Broadcasting
3 Comcast
4 Viacom
5 Disney
6 Comcast & Hearst Corporation
7 General Electric
8 Public Access
9 Public Access
10 Public Access
11 Corporation for Public Broadcasting
12 AOL Time Warner
13 News Corporation
14 Viacom
15 General Electric
16 Corporation for Public Broadcasting
17 Univision Communications
18 Independent WNDS
19 General Electric
20 Independent WMFP
21 Univision Communications
22 Public Access
23 Independent WYDN
24 Disney
25 Viacom
26 Disney
27 Discovery Communications
28 Viacom
29 Viacom
30 News Corporation
31 AOL Time Warner
32 E.W. Scripps
33 AOL Time Warner
34 Comcast, Disney & Liberty Media
35 Vivendi Universal
36 Disney & Hearst Corporation
37 Discovery Communications
38 Discovery Communications
39 Discovery Communications
40 AOL Time Warner & Liberty Media Group
41 News Corporation
42 AOL Time Warner
43 AOL Time Warner
44 C-SPAN
45 C-SPAN 2
46 General Electric
47 Landmark Communications
48 Disney
49 Disney
50 Disney
51 Boston Red Sox & Boston Bruins
52 News Corporation
53 General Electric & Microsoft
54 Liberty Media
55 Viacom
56 Religious Channel
57 General Electric
58 RTP
59 CableVision & TCI
60 AOL Time Warner
61 Viacom
62 Vivendi Universal
63 Discovery Communications
64 Viacom
65 Liberty Media
66 E.W. Scripps
67 Discovery Communications
68 Sony
70 USA Networks
71 General Electric
72 AOL Time Warner
73 AOL Time Warner
74 AOL Time Warner
75 AOL Time Warner
76 Liberty Media
77 Liberty Media
78 Comcast
79 Viacom
85 AOL Time Warner
95 Public Access
96 Viacom
98 Public Access
99 Viacom
201 Viacom
203 Liberty Media
204 Liberty Media
205 Liberty Media
206 Liberty Media
207 Liberty Media
209 Comcast
210 News International
211 Comcast, Disney & Liberty Media
212 CableVision & TCI
213 AOL Time Warner
216 Oxygen Media
217 Celtic Vision
218 Religious Channel
219 Comcast
220 Viacom
221 Discovery Communications
222 Disney
223 Viacom
224 Viacom
225 Liberty Media
226 Discovery Communications
227 Discovery Communications
229 Religious Channel
230 News International
231 Religious Channel
233 Discovery Communications
235 MBC Middle-east Broadcasting Center
236 Religious Channel
238 Religious Channel
239 E.W. Scripps
240 E.W. Scripps
241 Discovery Communications & BBC
242 Discovery Communications
243 Discovery Communications
244 Paul Allen (Microsoft)
245 Landmark Communications
246 Bloomberg
248 Disney
250 News International
251 Liberty Media
252 Discovery Communications
253 Discovery Communications
255 Global Outdoors
256 News International
270 Disney & Hearst Corporation
271 Cablevision
272 Viacom
273 Viacom
274 Viacom
275 Viacom
276 Viacom
277 Viacom
278 News International
279 Jones Radio Networks
301 AOL Time Warner
302 AOL Time Warner
303 AOL Time Warner
304 AOL Time Warner
305 AOL Time Warner
306 AOL Time Warner
307 AOL Time Warner
321 Liberty Media
322 Liberty Media
323 Liberty Media
324 Liberty Media
325 Liberty Media
326 Liberty Media
341 AOL Time Warner
342 AOL Time Warner
343 AOL Time Warner
344 AOL Time Warner
361 Viacom
362 Viacom
363 Viacom
364 Viacom
365 Viacom
366 Viacom
381 Viacom
382 Viacom
400 Comcast
401 Comcast
402 Comcast
403 Comcast
404 Comcast
405 Comcast
406 Comcast
407 Comcast
408 Comcast
409 Comcast
410 Comcast
411 Comcast
412 Comcast
413 Comcast
414 Comcast
415 Comcast
416 Comcast
417 Comcast
418 Comcast
419 Comcast
420 Comcast
421 Comcast
422 Comcast
423 Comcast
424 Comcast
425 Comcast
426 Comcast
427 Comcast
428 Comcast
429 Comcast
430 Comcast
431 Comcast
432 Comcast
433 Comcast
434 Comcast
435 Playboy
451 Playboy
452 Playboy
453 Playboy
457 Playboy
459 Playboy
701 News International
702 Liberty Media
703 StoryFirst Communications
704 Vila Group
705 General Electric
706 Discovery Networks
707 Liberty Media
708 News International
709 AOL Time Warner
710 Disney
711 Viacom
712 Viacom
Dec 18

Step 1: The RIAA issues a press release claiming that the “equivalent” of 421 CD burners were seized in a raid on music pirates.

Step 2: The Register follows up, noting that only 156 CD burners were seized. They contact the RIAA, who explain that some of the CD burners were quite fast, so the RIAA statisticians decided to count them as more than one burner.

Step 3: CNN blithely reports from the press release, claiming that 421 CD burners were seized. CNN is owned by AOL Time Warner, a member of the RIAA.