Feb 23

Joel Johnson, Gizmodo, 2010-02-03:

It’s taken me a couple of days for me to understand the wet sickness I felt in response to all the post-iPad whining, until it finally came up in a sputtering lump: disgust.

The iPad isn’t a threat to anything except the success of inferior products. [...]

This noxious attitude has permeated our tech culture for the last couple of decades, from a half-decade of open-source devotees crying about Microsoft on Slashdot, on toward the last few years of Apple ascendency. It’s childish. It’s defeatist. And it shows a simultaneous fear to actually innovate and improve while spilling gallons of capitulative semen to a fatuous, dystopian cuckold wank-mare. [...]

Apple is selling a product. They’ve chosen to keep it closed for demonstrably reasonable benefits. And—yes, okay!—several collateral benefits that come from controlling the marketplace that services their products.

Three weeks later, Joel Johnson, Gizmodo, 2010-02-23:

If you need another example of why the iTunes App Store’s walled garden is flawed, Apple has been only too happy to oblige, capriciously and arbitrarily removing an unknown number of “sexy” apps without warning. [...]

With a closed ecosystem comes a lot of responsibility. Apple has taken on the heavy mantle of arbiter, ostensibly to manage quality. I can forgive them for that, even if I don’t like it. But the only reason to ban blue apps is taste. And if these apps were a matter of taste, why were they approved in the first place? What will the next set of apps be that Apple decides are inappropriate long after people have spent hundreds of hours creating and marketing them? [...]

Apple has made a declaration: that sex and sexuality are shameful, even for adults. But only sometimes. And only when people complain.

Unfortunately, they’ve accomplished the opposite. The only thing I’m ashamed of is Apple.

Looks like Joel Johnson was fine when Apple was blocking things he didn’t care about, like open source software and apps he didn’t use; but when they started blocking stuff he cared about, like jiggling boobs, suddenly he started to have second thoughts.

He still doesn’t quite get it, though: He still likes having nanny tell him what he can run on his phone “to manage quality”; he just wants nanny to make only decisions that he agrees with. Good luck with that.

Jan 15

I hear that Eli Lilly are attempting to censor the Internet. Their target is an archive called “ZyprexaKills”, a tar file compressed with gzip containing leaked internal Eli Lilly documents relating to their antipsychotic drug Zyprexa.

As well as going after people who provide the file for download, Eli Lilly have been filing DMCA complaints against people who link to sites that have the file for download, or merely provide instructions on how to find it. The EFF are defending such sites.

Those who know me well will recall that I have a character flaw: if someone tells me I shouldn’t be allowed to read something or watch something, I immediately develop an overwhelming urge to do so.

In this case, I find myself somewhat conflicted. A lot of the anti-Zyprexa people appear to be anti-psychiatry crackpots, and I imagine the Church of Scientology has an interest somewhere; but on the other hand, it seems that Eli Lilly promoted unapproved use of their drug, engaged in a decade-long attempt to downplay its risks, and settled with 28,500 people for $1.2 billion rather than risk going to court to defend charges that the drug led to diabetes and other illnesses.

So although I’m a great believer in the healing power of psychiatric drugs, I also think this is a case where the public has a right—a need, even—to know the facts.

If you’re interested, a quick web search will turn up sources for the Zyprexa documents; I’m sure you don’t need me to spell out the procedure. Eli Lilly are going to discover that trying to remove the file from the Internet is rather like trying to remove the pee from a swimming pool.

Feb 02

Want to see the cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that are causing controversy? They’re on the web. Also here.

Personally, I don’t think they’re very good, except the second one, but that’s not really the point.

Jan 22

CBS are refusing to run the winning ad from MoveOn.org, supposedly on the grounds that they don’t allow political advertising regarding controversial issues during the Superbowl.

However, a look at the list of advertisers confirms that one ad will be from the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. So, no controversial political issues there.

Remember this next time someone posts bullshit about the “liberal media”.

Mar 31

#1: The SF Chronicle has suspended Henry Norr because he was arrested at a peace protest. He told them beforehand that he would likely be arrested and consequently would need to take a day off, as a personal day or sick day or vacation day. (Note that Henry Norr is a technology columnist, and his weekly column, delivered ahead of deadline, did not mention the war in any way.)

#2: The Yellow Times web site has been shut down by its ISP for publishing photos of Iraqi war casualties.